← Our products

Legal technology · OpenAI-powered review

Glassbox Review

Discovery expertise.
Connected to legal intelligence.

Give criminal-defense teams a clear path from police reports to source-linked findings, missing-discovery questions, and attorney review. Glassbox brings specialist review methods to the information that matters in a case.

Developed by Pearl Labs in partnership with Black Apple Consulting Group.

Glassbox Review

From the source.
Into the conversation.

Discovery & police reportsSource passages · Gaps · Review findings

Glassbox MCP

Designed forChatGPT + Astra for Law

OpenAI intelligence. Attorney judgment.

Integration overview · Model Context Protocol (MCP)
Illustrative evidence layers tracing a report passage to connected sources
Illustrative product artwork · Source-linked discovery review

The MCP connection

Specialist context for
OpenAI’s Astra for Law.

Glassbox’s Model Context Protocol (MCP) integration is designed to bring its discovery-review workflow into ChatGPT using OpenAI’s Astra for Law. The connection pairs specialist case context and source-linked findings with OpenAI’s legal intelligence.

For the attorney, the goal is a connected conversation: examine a finding, return to the source, and develop the next question with the relevant evidence at hand.

Explore OpenAI’s Astra for Law

The review workflow

Every finding deserves
a closer look.

Built to support attorney judgment, with source context and review decisions kept together.

01

Start with the source

Organize the police report and discovery materials. Keep findings connected to the passages and documents behind them.

02

Find the questions

Surface inconsistencies, evidence gaps, and missing discovery. Prepare review questions and cross-examination workups for the attorney to examine.

03

Exercise judgment

Accept, edit, reject, or hold a finding for more evidence. The attorney decides what belongs in the work product.

What the team reviews

A report is the input.
A focused workup is the value.

Designed for DWI and criminal-defense teams reviewing New Hampshire police-report and traffic-stop materials.

Actual Glassbox public sample report showing the gap-analysis summary, synthetic packet labels, and source and review status
Actual Glassbox public sample · Synthetic demonstration materials, not client work product. Explore the complete sample report ↗

A finding you can follow

A result is mentioned.
The supporting record is missing.

In the synthetic sample, the police report refers to a breath-test result. The corresponding printout is not attached. Glassbox keeps that evidence gap visible for counsel.

  1. 01 · Source

    Return to the report

    The finding points to the breath-result reference on page 6 of the sample police report. Counsel can examine the passage behind the issue.

  2. 02 · Follow-up

    Identify the missing record

    The missing breath-test printout becomes a specific discovery follow-up, with its source status kept alongside the finding.

  3. 03 · Review

    Keep judgment with counsel

    The issue remains pending review. The sample blocks official export; it demonstrates a review workflow, not a conclusion about a real case.

The useful output: a source-linked question and a concrete next step for the reviewer.

01An issue map with source context
Read the finding alongside the report passage or the missing-source status. Separate an inconsistency in the record from a question that needs more evidence.
02A focused discovery checklist
Identify follow-up materials such as body-camera footage, dispatch records, field-sobriety documentation, and chemical-test records for counsel to request or verify.
03Questions for the next review
Develop cross-examination prompts and workup questions connected to the issue being examined. Keep the attorney’s accept, edit, reject, or hold decision with the finding.
04A reviewable work-product draft
Carry source references, issue status, and verification limits into an internal draft that counsel can review before professional reliance.

Bring one review question to the demonstration.

Ask to follow a finding from the source passage through the review decision and into the work-product draft. Use a synthetic example to discuss the workflow; agree on your firm’s data requirements before sharing case materials.

Request a Glassbox workflow demonstration

Built with domain expertise

Pearl Labs engineering.
Black Apple insight.

Pearl Labs builds the software and AI workflow. Black Apple Consulting Group brings criminal-discovery review expertise informed by former local, state, and federal law-enforcement professionals.

The review workflow focuses on New Hampshire DWI and traffic-stop matters. Discuss your jurisdiction, source materials, and review needs with the team.

Meet Black Apple Consulting Group

Bring the review into focus.

Explore the Glassbox workflow, the MCP connection, and how they fit your team’s discovery process.

Talk with Pearl Labs